Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Analyzing an Argument in class lab

Annotation:
Sarah Hamal

Sarah's essay starts with background information on what a sport is defined as. She takes a position on this topic by stating how she thinks that pageants are distorting young girls to think that beauty is what matters most. She shows understanding of this topic by stating reasons why it does this, and then touching base on counter arguments. She sites many places for evidence like an article by Lucia Grosaru and news websites like the Newsweek. She uses specific examples like how controlling mothers change the girls and the real cost of forcing your daughter into pageants. She concludes her paper by stating her position on the subject of pageants.

Analyzing her Argument: 
1. a. Pageants can be more harmful than helpful to young girls.
b. The thesis is stated clearly in the first few sentences of the first paragraph. 
2. a. Her reasoning is that controlling mothers are the ones who enjoy the pageants not the kids, the tradition of doing pageants in the family can be harmful, and that even if the girls enjoy it is it a good thing to let a little girl enjoy fake teeth and overly edited pictures.
b. She uses quotes from news articles and online magazines to support her claims.
c. The reasons are plausible because many quotes come from people like psychologists who work with these kids. 
3. a. She addresses the counter arguments in her 3rd paragraph and deals with them by proving them wrong with facts. 
b. She refutes them and responds to them reasonably. 
c. She respects the argument but makes sure to prove that they are wrong. 
d. Her arguments are qualified because of the facts she uses. 
4. The author uses news articles and quotes from a psychologist. 
a. She uses quotes from them to prove her statement is true.
b. They are credible because they are people who have experienced the emotional damage that comes out of the pageants. 
c. A lot of the sources are from 2009, which is pretty decent and current. 
5. The writer addresses us as a reader by starting with a common question about sports. 
a. She assumes that people know what a sport is and is not but still writes her own definition. 
b. She does not include you and we. 
c. I think we share the belief that little girls should not be forced to do something they don't enjoy no matter how the mothers feel about it. 


 Micah Nelson:                                                                                                            

Micah has back ground information in the first paragraph by defining the dilemmas humans face and how they could be helped. He takes a position by stating what he will be writing on in this paper. He shows his understanding of the subject by stated what the earth is impacted by in the next paragraph. He cites the U.S Energy Information Administration website to make a point about how much energy is really used. He uses reasoning from another author as evidence as well. He uses many specifics throughout the paper like his thoughts on how electricity is effected by climate change.  At the end of his paper he states his position clearly in the first sentence and throughout the conclusion.

1. The claim is that people should cut back on energy.
a. He wants to make the point that we can improve lives with less energy use. 
b. His thesis is clearly stated at the end of the first paragraph. 
2. He uses quotes to support his claims. 
a. He states that cutting back on energy means that it can help climate change, make a healthier environment, and reduce bills.
b. He uses facts from national websites and the news.
c. They are plausible because he has the facts to support his claims. 
3. a. There were no counter arguments in his paper. 
b. N/A
c. N/A
d. His own arguments are qualified because he sticks to facts and not generalizations. 
4. He uses quotes and facts.
a. He uses them by integrating quotes. 
b. They are all credible because they are national data websites and news articles that use correct information. 
c. His sources range from 2000 to 2015
5. His addresses the readers by using we and talking about the earth. 
a. He assumes we all live on earth and know that there are problems with our planet. 
b. He includes the use of we and you. 
c. I think we share beliefs because I know that using less electricity will save money and that our planet is important to both of us.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
                                             

No comments:

Post a Comment